We have been having lots of discussions in Iowa with our Economic Development Department as well as our Technology Association of Iowa about entrepreneurship. Like many states, Iowa wants new, high tech companies in the state and they want to create jobs. There are a few ways to do that:
- Start new companies in Iowa
- Bring companies from other states to Iowa
- Expand existing businesses in Iowa
Now, if you are a betting person, which of the 3 expansion plans above gets the least attention? If you said “Expand existing businesses in Iowa,” you win the prize. I am certainly biased. Spindustry is a 15-year-old company (which I cannot believe, by the way – time flies) and no longer considered a startup, although I assure you we try to still think like one every day and still are in my opinion. We are also not a company that invents “widgets” or something you can hold and touch, thus are not as exciting to an outsider as a company inventing the latest medical gadget or car part.
The discussion we have been having, however, is “who is the best bet for growth.” I would contend in many cases a company like Spindustry who has shown technical competency and the ability to manage a business for 15 years could be more entrepreneurial and have a greater chance for success given some outside funds to create a product or suite of products. The argument is that a company like us should fund these things out of cash flow. And there is the rub. As a company like Spindustry grows, we do “have more to lose” than the “garage entrepreneur,” so while we could risk money from cash flow, we have to first protect current employees and the core business vs. throwing caution to the wind. But I would contend that we would also use this practicality and experience to spend an outsider’s, or state funded, money wiser than someone just starting out.
I am not saying to ignore the garage entrepreneur. I was one once. I just think when you are making investments in your state, you should bet on several different types of horses and that our type of company should be one of those.
On the topic of bringing companies in from out of state, I also think this can be beneficial, especially when large, but that the State of Iowa should also remember to help companies loyal to the state and help them grow. It’s honestly a little annoying to know a competitor has just been brought in from, say Omaha, and they are getting literally free rent, while you are waving the Iowa flag and paying expenses yourself. Again, not saying the state should never do it, just look at both options.
So, what do you think? Maybe the State of Iowa should not be investing money in companies with ideas at all; maybe this is a job for venture capitalists. But if you assume they should be investing in growing companies, creating jobs, and generating success stories, which do you think they should focus on?
Recent Comments